Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4560 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4560 is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4560
- Performs up to 2% better in Halo Infinite than Celeron G1620 - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $22.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
57.85007072135785%
Multi-Core
723
49.79338842975206%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Pentium G4560 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |