Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11800H outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11800H is 3081 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11800H
- Performs up to 8% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1620 - 320 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-11800H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-11800H |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
