Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 2432 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 60% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1620 - 231 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
