Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 15% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1620 - 292 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.954345917471468%
Multi-Core
723
9.33987856866038%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
