Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 77% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1620 - 244 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.445619335347432%
Multi-Core
723
5.250163386827391%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Dragon Range |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
