Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 4020 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 12% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1620 - 332 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 28 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
