Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7645HX outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7645HX is 3684 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX
- Performs up to 19% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 225 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 5 7645HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
15.272591486183721%
Multi-Core
723
6.1370002546473135%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
