Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3258 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 20% better in God of War than Celeron G1610T - 193 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 24 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$283.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $283.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |