Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3694 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 76% better in Rust than Celeron G1610T - 262 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 24 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
338
11.968838526912181%
Multi-Core
594
3.5477512990503492%
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |