Buy on Amazon
$150
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2699 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610T - 280 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
