Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 2342 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 69% better in F1 23 than Celeron B830 - 225 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 56 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 28 |
2 | Threads | 56 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 255 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |