Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 1823 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 22 than Celeron B830 - 274 vs 246 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 8 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Xeon W-2125 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
