Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9980HK outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9980HK is 2425 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-9980HK - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9980HK
- Performs up to 22% better in Minecraft than Celeron B830 - 708 vs 581 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i9-9980HK
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-9980HK |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
