Buy on Amazon
$210
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $422
Availability
MSRP in USD: $422
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3118 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Valorant than Celeron B830 - 869 vs 669 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
869
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i9-11900F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Celeron B830 or Core i9-11900F
Valorant, 1920 x 1080, High
656 FPS
$1.6/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070
Core i9-11900F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$1,049.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
