Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 2744 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 30% better in Dota 2 than Celeron B830 - 206 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 16 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 7th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 512SP |
| No | Overclockable | No |
