Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3236 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 29% better in New World than Celeron B820 - 124 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron B820
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400H |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
