Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 64 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Celeron B820 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |