Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2562 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron B820 - 260 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
260
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |