Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 119 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron B815 - 160 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$335
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $335 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |