Key Differences
In short — Core i3-560 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-560 is 490 days older than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i3-560 - 35 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-560
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron B815 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 4 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 29th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Core i3-560 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |