Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11260H outperforms Celeron 887 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11260H is 3174 days newer than Celeron 887.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 887
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i5-11260H - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11260H
- Performs up to 24% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron 887 - 128 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 887 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Celeron 887
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Core i5-11260H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 887 | vs | Intel Core i5-11260H |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1787 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
