Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-2125 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-2125 is 2263 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-2125 - 17 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-2125 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-2125
- Performs up to 16% better in Valorant than Celeron 847 - 767 vs 661 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Xeon W-2125
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Xeon W-2125 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
