Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2176M outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2176M is 2481 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2176M - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2176M
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron 847 - 183 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Xeon E-2176M
Server/Workstation • Apr 4th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2176M |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
