Key Differences
In short — Core i7-1068NG7 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-1068NG7 is 2965 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i7-1068NG7 - 17 vs 28 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-1068NG7
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 847 - 176 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i7-1068NG7
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i7-1068NG7 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ice Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1526 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Iris Plus |
| No | Overclockable | No |
