Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10300H outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10300H is 3378 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i5-10300H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Performs up to 23% better in Minecraft than Celeron 847 - 703 vs 570 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
