Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron 430 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron 430 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 5035 days newer than the cheaper Celeron 430.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 430
Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $49.99 vs $227.36
Up to 57% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-11600 - $0.29 vs $0.68 per FPS
Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
Performs up to 90% better in Apex Legends than Celeron 430 - 332 vs 175 FPS
Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 430 - 12 vs 1 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
332
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
43%
Price, $
$227.36
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $227.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
FPS in TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920x1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2007
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 430 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2007 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Conroe | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 775 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 | Cores | 6 |
| 1 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 9.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
