Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 825 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Celeron 3965U - 171 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 8 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 3965U
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3965U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
