Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 363 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 3865U - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 12 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7700 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |