Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms Celeron 3865U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 637 days newer than Celeron 3865U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 15 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 15% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron 3865U - 221 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3865U - 48 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
221
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3865U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |