Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 1550 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 20% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron 3205U - 237 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
