Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $107
Availability
MSRP in USD: $107
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-950 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-950 is 2098 days older than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Performs up to 12% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron 3205U - 72 vs 64 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-950 3.06 GHz 8 MB Cache Socket LGA1366 Processor
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Single-Core
280
60.475161987041034%
Multi-Core
486
30.975143403441685%
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-950 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2009 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.