Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10875H outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10875H is 1859 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i7-10875H - 15 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10875H
- Performs up to 18% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron 3205U - 212 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 16 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i7-10875H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i7-10875H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
![GIGABYTE [2020] AERO 15S OLED XB Thin+Light High Performance Laptop Image](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/laptops/B08DL8RP8C.jpg)
