Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 2012 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 15 vs 28 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 3205U - 172 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron 3205U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Core i3-1125G4
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 3205U | vs | Intel Core i3-1125G4 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Tiger Lake |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel BGA 1449 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 15.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Iris Xe Graphics G4 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
