Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2433 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron 2955U - 161 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 20 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$275.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1978 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |