Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Celeron 2955U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 3748 days newer than Celeron 2955U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - 15 vs 28 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 133% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 2955U - 140 vs 60 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 2955U - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 2955U
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
268
10.823909531502423%
Multi-Core
460
4.351939451277199%
Intel Celeron 2955U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
