Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron 1037U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2320 days newer than Celeron 1037U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1037U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron 1037U - 565 vs 427 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1037U - 12 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1037U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |