Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2276M outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2276M is 2320 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2276M - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Performs up to 477% better in League of Legends than Celeron 1007U - 173 vs 30 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 12 vs 2 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
No | Overclockable | No |