Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron 1007U - 173 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 8 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66801 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
249
16.17933723196881%
Multi-Core
419
9.057501080847384%
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |