Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 3678 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w7-2495X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 19% better in Apex Legends than Celeron 1000M - 299 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 48 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
12.579415501905972%
Multi-Core
511
2.729846679844009%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon W |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 48 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
