Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3153 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 93% better in War Thunder than Celeron 1000M - 238 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
12.924281984334204%
Multi-Core
511
5.1135795056539575%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
