Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron 1000M vs Core i9-11900F

Celeron 1000M vs Core i9-11900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $210 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 69 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900F

2.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $210 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 69 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1000M.

Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F

  • Performs up to 32% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron 1000M - 194 vs 147 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Total War: WARHAMMER III.
Total War: WARHAMMER III

Total War: WARHAMMER III

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron 1000M Logo
Celeron 1000M

Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013


FPS

147

75%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

194

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.08/FPS

100%

Price, $

$210

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i9-11900F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W

Buy for $210 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 69 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron 1000M Logo
Celeron 1000M

Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron 1000M Logo
Celeron 1000M

Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013


Single-Core

297

13%

Multi-Core

511

5%

Intel Core i9-11900F Logo
Core i9-11900F

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2171

100%

Multi-Core

9171

100%

Intel Celeron 1000M Logo

Intel Celeron 1000M

vs
Intel Core i9-11900F Logo

Intel Core i9-11900F

Jan 20th, 2013Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
CeleronCollectionCore i9
Ivy BridgeCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket G2 (988B)SocketIntel Socket 1200
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
2Threads
16
1.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.5 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed5.2 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
18.0xMultiplier
25.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Celeron 1000M or Core i9-11900F

Total War: WARHAMMER III, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.