Buy on Amazon
$319.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3820 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3820 is 342 days older than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3820 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Performs up to 12% better in Starfield than Celeron 1000M - 46 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.95/FPS
100%
Price, $
$319.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for $319.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
