Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 8945HS outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 8945HS is 3972 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS
- Performs up to 25% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron 1000M - 111 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 16 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 9 8945HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
12.536935415787251%
Multi-Core
511
4.4165946413137425%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
