Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 3840 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 166% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Celeron 1000M - 162 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 32 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 1000M
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Single-Core
297
10.543130990415335%
Multi-Core
511
3.099787685774947%
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
