Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms Celeron 1000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 142 days newer than Celeron 1000M.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1000M
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 4% better in Lost Ark than Celeron 1000M - 226 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1000M - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12595 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1000M | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |