In Control, the FX-9590 is same performance as the Xeon E5-2643. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $181 more expensive!
FX-9590
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2643
- Up to 64% cheaper – $100.70 vs $282.02
- Up to 64% cheaper
- Up to 64% better value in Control – $0.41 vs $1.15/FPS
- Up to 64% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 130 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Xeon E5-2643: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$282.02
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
36%
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.7
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Xeon E5-2643 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Xeon E5-2643 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2643
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2643 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA2011 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
