Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 2704 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - 144 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-9590 - $119.89 vs $288.02
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-9590 - $0.83 vs $2.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 12 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $288.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7022 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $119.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7023 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-9590 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |