In Control, the FX-9590 is slightly slower than the Core i5-12400 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $119 more expensive!
FX-9590
No clear advantages
Core i5-12400
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 252 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 42% cheaper – $162.76 vs $282.02
- Up to 42% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in Control – $0.64 vs $1.14/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 65 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
Control FPS Calculator
FX-9590 vs Core i5-12400: Comparison of performance and price
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
246 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
161 FPS
98%
Price, $
$282.02
57%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
56%
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
252 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$162.76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9590 vs Core i5-12400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9590 vs Core i5-12400 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
44%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Core i5-12400
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
18 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
88%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12400 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 220 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
