In Deathloop, the FX-9370 is same performance as the Xeon W3565. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Nov 01, 2009
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3565
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 130 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 41% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Xeon W3565: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Xeon W3565 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Xeon W3565 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon W3565
Nov 1st, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3565 Nov 1st, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
