In Atomfall, the FX-9370 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
FX-9370
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 80 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
FX-9370 vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-9370 vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-9370
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
54%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
FX-9370 Jun 11th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| AM3+ | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 220W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1866 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
